双卿真伪再考辨

• 作者： 陈宇清 ¹
• 作者单位：
  1.  苏州大学 文学院
• 提交时间：2024-09-15

摘要: 《西青散记》记载的双卿其人其作真伪长期处于争议状态,近年来实有其人的观点逐渐成为主 流。 通过对《西青散记》文本本身及其他外部资料的进一步爬梳,可以看到记载双卿的史料并不可靠,作 者史震林写作《西青散记》时并未抱持“实录精神”,双卿其人出于虚构既符合逻辑和体例也有历史先例可 据。 史震林塑造这一虚构形象并加以掩饰的“造假”动机有“家国同构”背景下的“男子作闺音”兴寄传 统,以及特定历史背景下掩藏兴寄之意寻求安全的需要。

Abstract: The verity of Shuangqing, who was recorded in Xi Qing San Ji, has been controversial for a long time. In recent years, the view that she was a real historical figure became mainstream gradually. By analyzing the text of Xi Qing San Ji itself and external documents further, it can be seen that historical materials recording Shuangqing are unreliable, as the author Shi Zhenlin didn't have the spirit of chronicle during his writing process, and the fictionality of Shuangqing not only conforms to logic and the stylistic rules and layout but also is based on historical precedents. One of the motives of fabrication with which Shi Zhenlin portrayed the fictional image was the tradition of indication called “men make the boudoir sounds” by the background of the same structure of the clan and country, while the other was the request to cover up his intention of indication to seek safety at the specific historical background.

• 分类： 中国语言文学 >> 中国古代文学
• 稿件状态： 已在期刊出版
期刊名称： 《复旦学报（社会科学版）》 2024年 第4期 “中国古代文学研究”专栏
• 引用： PSSXiv:202409.01303 (或此版本 PSSXiv:202409.01303V1)
  DOI:10.12451/202409.01303
  CSTR:32012.36.PSSXiv.202409.01303
• 推荐引用方式： 陈宇清.双卿真伪再考辨.复旦学报（社会科学版）,2024(4).[PSSXiv:202409.01303V1] (点此复制)