摘要: 作为档案安全刑法保障的“最后防线”,档案犯罪刑罚具有遏制和预防犯罪的重要功 能。考察中国裁判文书网公布的 14份档案犯罪裁判文书发现,档案犯罪刑罚总体呈现犯罪追诉率 低、适用罪名集中、量刑畸轻、缓刑比例大、犯罪人再犯率高等特征,难以有效惩戒和预防档案犯 罪行为。究其主要缘由,既有档案犯罪刑罚种类单一的因素,也有档案犯罪量刑标准宽泛等原因。 建议通过立法增设档案犯罪财产刑和资格刑、统一档案犯罪量刑标准、规范档案犯罪缓刑适用等 方式,提升档案犯罪刑罚质效。
Abstract: As the "last line of defense" for the criminal law protection of archival security, the penalty for archival crimes has an important function of containing and preventing crimes. Examining the 14 archival crime judgment documents published on China Judgments Online, the overall punishment for archival crimes is characterized by low criminal prosecution rate, concentrated applicable charges, unusually light sentencing, large proportion of probation, and high recurrence rate of offenders, making it difficult to effectively punish and prevent archival crimes. The main reason is the single type of punishment for archival crimes, as well as the broad sentencing standards for archival crimes. It is recommended to improve the quality and efficiency of punishment for archival crimes through legislation, including adding property and qualification penalties for archival crimes, unifying sentencing standards for archival crimes, and standardizing the application of probation for archival crimes.
[V1] | 2024-07-19 09:04:56 | PSSXiv:202408.00781V1 | 下载全文 |
1. 开放科学实践特征分析与启示——基于美国OSTP“开放科学年”项目 | 2024-10-15 |
2. 政府数据开放生态系统如何驱动数据要素市场化发展 ——基于模糊集定性比较分析 | 2024-10-15 |
3. 公共数据开放中隐性安全风险的内涵、 表现及其生成逻辑 | 2024-10-15 |
4. “副号即隐私”:Z世代用户社交媒体信息发布行为特点研究 | 2024-10-15 |
5. 新老年用户短视频生成行为动因研究 ——麦克拉斯基需求分类理论视角 | 2024-10-15 |