档案犯罪刑罚的实证检视与立法回应——基于中国裁判文书网14份文书的分析

• 作者： 蒋云飞 ^1,2 袁   奎 ¹
• 作者单位：
  1.  重庆行政学院法学教研部

  2.  华东政法大学博士后流动站
• 提交时间：2024-07-19

摘要: 作为档案安全刑法保障的“最后防线”，档案犯罪刑罚具有遏制和预防犯罪的重要功 能。考察中国裁判文书网公布的 14份档案犯罪裁判文书发现，档案犯罪刑罚总体呈现犯罪追诉率 低、适用罪名集中、量刑畸轻、缓刑比例大、犯罪人再犯率高等特征，难以有效惩戒和预防档案犯 罪行为。究其主要缘由，既有档案犯罪刑罚种类单一的因素，也有档案犯罪量刑标准宽泛等原因。 建议通过立法增设档案犯罪财产刑和资格刑、统一档案犯罪量刑标准、规范档案犯罪缓刑适用等 方式，提升档案犯罪刑罚质效。

Abstract: As the "last line of defense" for the criminal law protection of archival security, the penalty for archival crimes has an important function of containing and preventing crimes. Examining the 14 archival crime judgment documents published on China Judgments Online, the overall punishment for archival crimes is characterized by low criminal prosecution rate, concentrated applicable charges, unusually light sentencing, large proportion of probation, and high recurrence rate of offenders, making it difficult to effectively punish and prevent archival crimes. The main reason is the single type of punishment for archival crimes, as well as the broad sentencing standards for archival crimes. It is recommended to improve the quality and efficiency of punishment for archival crimes through legislation, including adding property and qualification penalties for archival crimes, unifying sentencing standards for archival crimes, and standardizing the application of probation for archival crimes.

• 分类： 信息资源管理 >> 档案学
• 稿件状态： 已在期刊出版
期刊名称： 《档案与建设》 2024年 第2期
• 引用： PSSXiv:202408.00781 (或此版本 PSSXiv:202408.00781V1)
  DOI:10.12451/202408.00781
  CSTR:32012.36.PSSXiv.202408.00781
• 推荐引用方式： 蒋云飞,袁   奎.档案犯罪刑罚的实证检视与立法回应——基于中国裁判文书网14份文书的分析.档案与建设,2024(2).[PSSXiv:202408.00781V1] (点此复制)