摘要: 1949-1966年即十七年时期的社会主义美术也
不全然都是受“苏派”影响的现实主义写实风格,一批艺
术家仍然坚持有别于主流的现代主义风格,并从印象主
义、表现主义、形式主义等多重视角来构建新中国的图
景。他们中有20世纪前期就留洋的颜文樑、周碧初、胡善
馀、刘海粟、关良、谭华牧、符罗飞、林风眠、倪贻德,
也有20世纪五六十年代留学东德的梁运清和“罗训班”的
学员夏培耀、金一德,以及来华的外国艺术家博巴、麦绥
莱勒。尽管处境边缘,但他们仍然在现实主义与现代主
义,宏大叙事与个人语言之间努力探索一种平衡,以“社
会主义现代主义”的差异化表达为新中国的社会主义美术
提供了另类路径。
Abstract: The socialist fine arts in the seventeen years from 1949 to 1966 were
not all realistic styles influenced by the “Soviet School”. A group of artists still adhered
to a modernist style different from the mainstream, and built the visual image of new
China from impressionism, expressionism, formalism and other perspectives. Among
them are Yan Wenliang, Zhou Bichu, Hu Shanyu, Liu Haisu, Guan Liang, Tan Huamu,
Fu Luofei, Lin Fengmian, Ni Yide who studied abroad in the early 20th century, Liang
Yunqing who studied in East Germany in the 1950s and 1960s, and Xia Peiyao, Jin
Yide, young students of the “Popa class”. And foreign artists Popa and Masereel also
came to China. Despite their marginal situation, they still strove to explore a balance
between realism and modernism, grand narrative and personal language, and provided
an alternative path for socialist art in new China with the differential expression of
“socialist modernism”.
[V1] | 2024-09-03 16:52:23 | PSSXiv:202409.00417V1 | 下载全文 |
1. 艺术之真的探究 | 2024-11-01 |
2. 寻找时间的时间——论洪尚秀电影中的时间晶体 | 2024-10-31 |
3. 非遗文化元素在城市会展设计中的创新应用研究 | 2024-10-30 |
4. 信仰表征与权力维护:先秦仪式装饰艺术的功能价值 | 2024-10-29 |
5. 艺术青年“城乡两栖化”介入乡村振兴:特征、机理及对策建议 | 2024-10-28 |