摘要:
安乐哲认为,西方学界翻译中国哲学的经典文本一直受到无意识的基督教框架的影响,这种影响一直持续到现在。不同于以往的翻译方式,安乐哲和合作伙伴提出了新的翻译策略并称之为“自觉性诠释”。其解释框架包含包括一个提供解释性背景的引言,一个不断发展的关键哲学术语词汇表,一个自觉性的解释翻译方法以及权威的中文关键文本。这种方式将文本置于其自身的语境中,是忠于原文的一种翻译方式。
在比较哲学的视野下,安乐哲基于儒家伦理中的“关系”这一事实提出了“儒家角色伦理学”。他认为,儒家伦理强调关系的优先性,它排除了任何关于终极个体的概念;儒家角色伦理学反对一种概念上要求行为者与行为分离的非批判性的实体本体论;儒家角色伦理学重视身体在实现个人身份和完美行为中所发挥的重要作用——身体是人类行为得到滋养和成长的根或干;儒家角色伦理强调了道德创造力在完善思维和生活中所扮演的关键角色;儒家的角色伦理并不与德性伦理学或任何其他伦理学理论竞争,而是一种抵抗理论与实践分歧的道德生活愿景。
基于此,安乐哲认为儒家角色伦理是一种推崇尊重和相互依存的关系价值观,为超脱具有零和性质的人类生存困境提供了对策,是应对当前国际社会个人主义盛行的有效方案。
Abstract:
Roger T. Ames positsargues that the translation of classical Chinese philosophical texts by Western scholars has long been unwittingly influenced by an unconscious Christian framework, a legacy that persists to the present daytoday. In contrast to previous translationDeparting from traditional approaches, he Ames and his partners collaborators have proposedhave proposed a new novel translation strategymethdology, which they cal termedl self-consciously interpretative .Their This approach interpretive comprisesstructure consists of an introduction that providinges an interpretive context, an evolving glossary of key philosophical terms, a self-consciously interpretive translation, and the inclusion of the defi nitiveauthoritative critical Chinese text. This approachThis approach situates the text within its own cultural milieu and places the text in its own context and remains is a form of translation that is faithful to the original intent.
From the perspective of comparative philosophy, Roger T. Ames proposederivesd Confucian role ethics based on thefrom the foundational concept fact of relationship within Confucian ethics. He believescontends that: Confucian role ethics would insist onemphasizes the primacy of vital relationships, and would precludeexcluding any notion of final ultimate individuality. ;Confucian role ethics resists opposes a non-critical the uncritical substance ontology underlying that separates a conception of agency that requires a separation between the agent of conduct and the conduct itselfagent from action conceptually. Moreover, ;Confucian role it underscores the ethicists appreciate the dramaticpivotal role that of the body has as integral to achievingin shaping personal identity and consummate exemplary conduct, portraying the body as the nurturing and growing root of human behavior. ——the body as the root or trunk through which human conduct, being nourished and grown, becomes refulgent;Confucian role ethics emphasizes highlights the vitalcritical role that the process of moral imaginationcreativity plays in fostering profound thought and ethical consummate thinking and living, without engaging in competition ;Confucian role ethics does not compete with virtue ethics or any other ethical theories. Instead,y but it presents a moralis rather a vision that transcends of the moral life that resists the theoretical-/practical divides.
SoBased on these assertions, Roger T. Ames believes posits that Confucian role ethics is aespouses relational values that advocatespromoting respect and interinterdependence, presenting. It provides the besta viable solution for to transcendding the “zero-sum” nature of human survival plight and is an effectively solution to deal withaddressing the prevalence of individualism in the current internationalcontemporary global society.
[V1] | 2024-05-06 10:15:29 | PSSXiv:202405.00330V1 | 下载全文 |
1. 《海国图志》中“长技”的多重义蕴及其深闳的改制理想——魏源“师夷长技以制夷”的再诠释 | 2024-09-20 |
2. 内修与外用——略论《六韬》的政治思想 | 2024-09-19 |
3. 尘封的黄老经典—— 《六韬》及《六韬逸文》的两个系统的思想考察及其意义 | 2024-09-19 |
4. 忠君与忠礼——“逢丑父”形象所引出的对《春秋》“忠”概念之思考 | 2024-09-19 |
5. 中华民族现代文明的人学意蕴 | 2024-09-18 |