摘要: 随着《民法典》以及司法解释的出台,实务部门在审理忠诚协议案件中“同案不同判”的问题并没有消解。面对忠诚协议是否有效的质疑,体系化视角审视《民法典》总则编、婚姻家庭编、合同编、侵权责任编以及人格权编的内在关联,可以发现忠诚协议在违约之诉与离婚诉讼中仍具有适法空间。在明晰忠诚协议有效之前提条件与除外情形基础上,探讨其参照适用合同编单独起诉之路径及离婚诉讼中证据辅助之功能,实务部门可以结合《民法典》各编原则性规范与具体性内容,对违约金、财产分配以及精神损害赔偿等主张作出合理的自由裁量。
Abstract: With the promulgation of the Civil Code and judicial interpretation, the problem of“ different judgmentsin the same case” in the trial of loyalty agreement cases has not been solved. Facing the question of whetherthe loyalty agreement is valid, this paper examines the internal relations among the general provisions, mar-riage and family, contract, tort liability and personality rights of the Civil Code from a systematie perspec-tive, and finds that the loyalty agreement still has room for application in breach of contract and divorce proceedings. On the basis of clarilying the preconditions and exceptions of the validity of loyalty agreement, thispaper diseusses the path of separate prosecution by relerring to the applicable contract and the function of ev-idence assistance in divorce proceedings. The judiciary can make reasonable diseretion on the claims of liqui.dated damages, property distribution and compensation for mental damages in combination with the principlesand specific contents of the Civil Code.
[V1] | 2024-04-10 16:45:54 | PSSXiv:202404.00045V1 | 下载全文 |
1. “区块链+农业众筹” :创新、风险及其法治监管 | 2024-11-20 |
2. 涉“两卡”犯罪的新型犯罪司法治理问题研究 | 2024-11-20 |
3. 非法经营同类营业罪民营企业董事、监事、高级管理人员入罪必要性解析 | 2024-11-20 |
4. 法律实践与乡村秩序体系的建构 ———基于韩村土地承包费纠纷的考察 | 2024-11-20 |
5. 知识产权视角下农民品种保护的规范构造 | 2024-11-20 |