法益修复与功能违法论

• 作者： 杜宇 ¹
• 作者单位：
  1.  复旦大学
• 提交时间：2024-06-05

摘要: 法益修复在刑法体系上应如何定位? 其背后隐含着难得的理论创生契机,即将法益修复置入违法评价之中,由此推动违法论的功能化转向。在功能违法论的构造中,违法性由应罚的违法性与需罚的违法性两个层面组成。前者立足于违法宣告的正当性,后者则着眼于违法宣告的现实必要性。两者在审查内容、检验顺序、评价方向等方面具有明显差异,存在着一种既相互补充亦相互限制的协动关系。功能违法论的提出,不但使功能化思考得以体系性贯穿,而且使不同维度的功能化评价得以清晰分离,并与犯罪论阶层妥当配合。

Abstract: The positioning of legal interest restoration within the criminal law system presents an opportunity for theoretical innovation by integrating it into assessments of illegality, thereby promoting a functional shift in the theory of illegality. Within this theory, illegality consists of two dimensions: illegality for which punishment should be imposed and illegality for which punishment is necessary. The former concerns the legitimacy of declaring an act illegal, while the latter focuses on the practical imperative of punishment. These dimensions exhibit significant differences in scrutiny, procedural sequence, and evaluative orientation, while also maintaining a symbiotic relationship characterized by mutual complementarity and constraint. Introducing the functional theory of illegality not only facilitates systematic consideration of functionality but also enables clear separation and proper alignment within the criminological hierarchy.

• 分类： 法学 >> 刑法学
• 稿件状态： 已在期刊出版
期刊名称： 《中国社会科学》 2024年 第3期 “中国式现代化与中国自主的知识体系”专栏
• 转载期刊： 复印报刊资料《刑事法学》 2024年 第7期
• 引用： PSSXiv:202406.00317 (或此版本 PSSXiv:202406.00317V1)
  DOI:10.12451/202406.00317
  CSTR:32012.36.PSSXiv.202406.00317
• 推荐引用方式： 杜宇.法益修复与功能违法论.中国社会科学,2024(3).[PSSXiv:202406.00317V1] (点此复制)