An Analysis to Jameson’s Non-Political Representation of Capital
摘要: 詹姆逊对《资本论》的非政治再现只是后现代“认知测绘”的一个基本操作。通过对《资本论》第一卷的微观考察,詹姆逊认为马克思没有阐述政治与革命的问题,或者马克思把其间隐含或突然出现的政治与革命观点被对立统一的严谨论证表达方式自我否定了,而其中最有政治革命性的历史预言则是一次“更重要的断裂”。通过对《资本论》第一卷中的时间、空间与辩证法三个维度的专门透视,詹姆逊确认其中没有政治革命性的内容,总结得出《资本论》第一卷没有政治结论的政治结论。詹姆逊对《资本论》的非政治再现,意在告别宏大社会政治革命理论,是对马克思主义非整体性的理解,也是其对马克思主义理想信仰幻灭,走向后现代微观政治文化批判的生存策略的再现。
Abstract: Jameson’s non-political representation to Capital is only a basic operation of postmodern “cognitive mapping”.Through the microscopic investigation of Volume I of Capital,he believes that Marx does not elaborate on the problem of politics and revolution, or Marx denies the implicit or sudden political and revolutionary views by the rigorous demonstration and expression of the unity of opposites,and the most politically revolutionary historical prediction is a “more important fracture”.Through the special perspective of the three dimensions of time, space and dialectics in Volume I of Capital,Jameson confirms that there is no political revolutionary content, and concludes that there is no political conclusion in Volume I of capital.Jameson’s non political reappearance of capital is intended to bid farewell to the grand social and political revolution theory.It is not only the understanding of the non integrity of Marxism, but also the reappearance of his survival strategy of disillusionment with Marxist ideals and beliefs and moving towards postmodern micro political and cultural criticism.
[V1] | 2024-10-12 19:59:35 | PSSXiv:202410.01686V1 | 下载全文 |
1. “中体西用”与儒学经世传统的转型 | 2024-10-28 |
2. 从 “两个和解” 思想看中华民族现代文明的价值指向与实践逻辑 | 2024-10-24 |
3. 现代西方社会的精神病理及诊治:弗洛姆自由思想刍议 | 2024-10-18 |
4. 美学发现与价值重塑:农业文化遗产的审美转向 | 2024-10-17 |
5. 生成式AI驱动新质生产力发展的动力机制、困境识别与优化路径 | 2024-10-15 |