您当前的位置:首页 > 论文详情

论人工智能生成内容著作权问题——基于中美案例的比较

请选择邀稿期刊:

摘要: 人工智能生成内容应当享有著作权且著作权应当赋予人工智能系统的使用者。美国版权局基于人工智能生成内容的创作主体为人工智能系统否定人工智能生成内容的可版权性并不合理。赋予人工智能生成内容著作权符合劳动产生财产权的哲学原理,可以激励人们的劳动投入,有利于相关产业的发展和创新。当然赋予人工智能生成内容以著作权会产生一定的司法和行政成本,因此对于该内容的著作权登记,应持审慎态度,可以否定其可登记性,或者设立一定的登记门槛,以节约版权登记机关的行政成本。

Abstract: AI-generated content should enjoy copyright protection, and the copyright should be assigned to the users of the AI system. It is unreasonable for U.S. Copyright Office to deny the copyright-ability of AI-generated content based on the premise that the creator of AI-generated content is an AI system. Granting copyright to AI-generated content aligns with the philosophical principle that labor generates property rights, which can give people incentive to labor, and benefit the development and innovation of related industries. Assigning copyright to AI-generated content would incur certain judicial and administrative costs; therefore, a cautious approach should be taken regarding the registration of such copyrights. The registrability could be denied or certain thresholds could be established for registration to save on administrative costs.

版本历史

[V1] 2024-09-13 11:46:18 PSSXiv:202409.00764V1 下载全文
点击下载全文
在线阅读
许可声明
metrics指标
  •  点击量470
  •  下载量147
  • 评论量 0
评论
分享
邀请专家评阅
收藏