Application and Reflection on Research Methods in the Field of Digital Humanities in China
摘要: [目的/意义] 数字人文作为近年来发展迅猛典型的交叉学科,对于研究交叉学科研究方法的应用具有重要价值。[方法/过程] 通过描述性统计分析方法、LDA模型主题分析法、内容分析法、网络与文献调查法,结合相关研究案例,对CNKI发表于核心期刊且经过人工交叉筛选后的1409篇数字人文主题的相关文献进行梳理分析,总结我国数字人文领域研究方法的应用现状与特征规律,并进行批判性反思。[结果/结论]研究发现,我国数字人文研究偏好思辨研究;具有一定的时变性;以单一研究方法为主;混合研究方法搭配丰富;不同研究方法的主题内容存在差异。总体来看,现阶段我国数字人文领域研究方法应用呈现出多元性、针对性、混合性的特征规律。鉴于此,提出未来可基于理念层、操作层、规范层、伦理层对我国数字人文领域研究方法应用进行规范,从而为今后我国数字人文研究的严谨科学提供方法层面的参考指导。
Abstract: [Purpose/significance] Digital humanities, as a rapidly developing interdisciplinary field in recent years, has significant value in the application of interdisciplinary research methods. [Method/process] Through descriptive statistical analysis, LDA model topic analysis, content analysis, network and literature survey methods, combined with relevant research cases, 1409 relevant literature on digital humanities topics published in core journals by CNKI and manually cross screened were sorted and analyzed. The application status and characteristic rules of research methods in the field of digital humanities in China were summarized, and critical reflection was conducted. [Results/conclusion] The study found that China’s digital humanities research prefers speculative research;It has a certain degree of temporal variability; It mainly uses a single research method;It has rich combinations of mixed research methods; There are differences in the thematic content of different research methods. Overall, at present, the application of research methods in the field of digital humanities in China presents a characteristic pattern of diversity, pertinence, and hybridization. In view of this, it is proposed that in the future, research methods in the field of digital humanities in China can be standardized based on the conceptual, operational, normative, and ethical layers, providing methodological reference and guidance for the rigorous and scientific research of digital humanities in China.
[V1] | 2024-10-01 17:53:29 | PSSXiv:202410.00167V1 | 下载全文 |
1. 大模型赋能政民互动的运行逻辑、潜在风险与规制策略——基于行动者网络视角的分析 | 2024-10-29 |
2. 中文指南共识类文献同时/二次发表中存在的问题及建议 | 2024-10-25 |
3. 第九届全国高校青年档案学者学术论坛综述 | 2024-10-25 |
4. 现代公共文化服务体系的历史逻辑、中国特色与未来展望 | 2024-10-25 |
5. 公共文化服务体系运转的理论框架、制度逻辑和健全路径 | 2024-10-25 |